On the list of key concepts that most clinicians want to do is have the proper diagnosis of their patient's condition right. Until they get that appropriate, then conclusions as to the ideal treatment can not be made and advice offered for the best course of action proposed. Ordinarily any diagnosis was based upon the physical evaluation in addition to a look at the background of the issue and limited imaging such as an x-ray. If your diagnosis could not be established out of that data, then it became a matter of pursuing the client to observe how the symptoms progress and so the diagnosis could become clearer. These days aside from the basic and simple x-ray we've got a great deal more complex imaging techniques including ultrasound and that is making the diagnosis process so much easier. An show of the podiatry live, PodChatLive was focused on the issue of diagnostic ultrasound to help you examine disorders in the foot.

In this episode of PodChatLive the hosts invited on Stuart Wildman to talk about his experiences with the use of diagnostic ultrasound. He is a Physiotherapist, musculoskeletal Sonographer and Director of The Ultrasound Site Ltd based in the UK. They outlined some of the politics and teaching with regards to ultrasound use, specifically what the advantages and restrictions of ultrasound are generally, and the tissues and pathologies that may be pictured around the feet and ankle with ultrasound. Stuart is the Owner and Director of The Ultrasound Site Ltd which he launched in 2013. Stuart splits his time between Radiology and Physiotherapy where he performs both diagnostic and guided interventions in both environments. Stuart Wildman qualified from the University of Southampton in the UK in 2003 with a BSc in Physiotherapy, and proceeded to achieve an MSc in Advanced Neuromusculoskeletal Physiotherapy at The University of Hertfordshire and a PostGrad Certificate in MSK Sonography at Canterbury and the Christ Church University.

 

A recently popular method to handle excessive use injuries which can be common in runners is to use gait retraining. That is changing how a runner runs using a totally different style. It's a good idea that if you have an overuse injury from running one way, then modify the way you run. There is still much to be learned about this process, however it is becoming a lot more common and a lot of health professionals along with running technique coaches are using this to assist runners. There is a newly released episode of PodChatLive that was devoted to this issue. PodChatLive is a livestrem for podiatrists and other health care professionals hosted by Craig Payne in Australia and Ian Griffiths in England. They go live on Facebook with a brand new guest each week. The taped version is then uploaded to YouTube and a podcast edition is in addition available.

In the episode of PodChatLive on gait retraining in runners Ian and Craig talked with this with James Dunne. James is a very highly regarded running coach as well as the owner of the Kinetic Revolution to help runners with their training and running techniques. In the episode they talked about why then when we would choose to modify a runners running technique, and how a clinician may well do that. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that an individual approach is essential, and there are no blanket methods. One size doesn't fit all. They discussed the bidirectional and symbiotic partnership between running coachs and Podiatrists. James is a runner, a sports rehabilitation therapist and coach from Norwich in the United Kingdom. James has a qualification in sports rehabilitation. He started the Kinetic Revolution coaching website back in 2010 as a method of spreading just what he learned on his journey as an ex-pro rugby player to working in the sports injury community, and to him learning to be a marathon runner.

Being familiar with scientific studies are an important part of the training of all health professionals. This involves both doing research and comprehend research. This can be very important as all health professionals have to need to be equipped to put into action research studies in their clinical work. Sometimes research conclusions will contradict the ideas of individual clinicians and so they require the knowledge to be able to overcome these disparities to give the ideal research based therapy  for their patients. It is the research which tells us what therapies do give you results and which of them possibly fail to work or are no better than a placebo. On the regular chat show for podiatry practitioners, PodChatLive this is a theme which comes up on a regular basis in the framework of a number of topics that they can discuss. It's such an essential concern that the hosts of PodChatLive focused an entire episode to the topic of research methods and their benefits for clinicians to really comprehend.

In this episode on research methods the hosts spoke with the research physiotherapist Rod Whiteley. In the stream they discussed the reason it is vital for all clinicians to often read and comprehend research papers and become confident performing this. They brought up some suggestions regarding how to read a paper along the way. They highlighted the challenge of p values and the reason why 0.05 is not the miracle cut off point along with the use of confidence intervals, reliability, number needed to treat (NNT) and also the minimal clinically important difference. One important takeaway for everyone from the edition is usually to find out about effect sizes. Dr Rod Whiteley PhD is a Consultant Sports Physiotherapist who has served at the College of Sports Physiotherapy’s Board as their Chief Examiner and also has worked with quite a few professional and international sports teams and athletes in many sports, including Rugby League and Union, Football, Baseball, Squash, and Athletics.

There is a serious debate going on right now in the running area connected with a probable unjust benefit coming from performance increasing athletic shoes. They are footwear that provide a return of energy following the foot has striked the road. Most of these athletic shoes are perhaps unlawful and efficiency improving, however they have not been forbidden yet. Just about all top level athletes are actually running in them in marathons and plenty of nonelite athletes are likewise utilizing them to obtain an alleged performance boost. They have turned out to be so commonly used, it might not be possible for the regulators to manage there use, whether or not they needed to. The latest show of the podiatry live was devoted to this predicament, especially the conflict round the Nike Vaporfly and Next% athletic shoes.

In this episode of PodChatLive, hosts spoke with Alex Hutchinson discussing these athletic shoes that appears to have shifted the needle a lot more than another shoe of all time of running, the Nike Vaporfly and Next%. Craig, Ian and Alex reviewed should they come good on their promotion guarantee of enhancing athletes by 4% and just what does that really really mean? They talked about just where will the line involving technology and ‘shoe doping’ get drawn and when these shoes could they be only for high level runners. Alex Hutchinson is an author and also a journalist based in Toronto, in Canada. His key focus nowadays is the science of endurance and also conditioning, that he covers for Outside magazine, The Globe and Mail, as well as the Canadian Running magazine. Alex additionally covers technologies for Popular Mechanics (in which he won a National Magazine Award for his energy reporting) as well as adventure travel and leisure for the New York Times, and has been a Runner’s World writer from 2012 to 2017. Alex's most recent book is an investigation of the science of endurance. It’s called ENDURE: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance.